Summary. We revisit Nash’s axiomatic bargaining solution when coalitions employ threats that must be consistent with their solutions. As in Nash, our solution maximizes a (possibly weighted) product of payoffs for each coalition, but subcoalitional threats appear as conventional constraints that are not netted out when maximizing the Nash product. We study different aspects of this coalitional solution, including its connections to a notion of “pragmatic egalitarianism”. We then embed the solution into a setting with externalities, and define viable coalitional structures, under which every coalition follows its coalitional solution but interacts noncooperatively with other coalitions. We discuss applications to public goods, R&D coalitions, oligopoly cartels, and hospital networks.
This paper reviews the literature on aspirations in economics, with a particular focus on socially determined aspirations. The core theory builds on two fundamental principles: (a) aspirations can serve to inspire, but still higher aspirations can lead to frustration and resentment; and (b) aspirations are largely determined by an individual’s social environment. We discuss the implications of this framework for the study of interpersonal inequality, social conflict, fertility choices, risk taking and goal-setting.
(with Joan Esteban and Laura. Mayoral),American Economic Review 102, 1310-1342, 2012. Online Appendix.
Summary. We examine empirically the impact of ethnic divisions on conflict, by using a specification based on Esteban and Ray (2011). That theory links conflict intensity to three indices of ethnic distribution: polarization, fractionalization, and the Gini-Greenberg index. The empirical analysis verifies that these distributional measures are significant correlates of conflict. These effects persist as we introduce country-specific measures of group cohesion and of the importance of public goods, and combine them with the distributional measures exactly as described by the theory.
